Flexible and floating exchange rates offer an effective international monetary arrangement.
π2.4%
π€28.3%
π69.2%
Tariffs and import quotas usually reduce general economic welfare.
π5.3%
π€25.4%
π69.3%
Some restrictions on the flow of financial capital are essential to the stability and soundness of the international financial system.
π24.6%
π€39.8%
π35.6%
The economic benefits of an expanding world population outweigh the economic costs.
π42.4%
π€32.5%
π25.0%
The persistent U.S. trade deficit is due primarily to non-tariff trade barriers and/or nominal exchange rate manipulations.
π77.3%
π€14.5%
π8.2%
A large balance of trade deficit has an adverse effect on the economy.
π65.2%
π€25.9%
π8.9%
An economy that operates below potential GDP has a self correcting mechanism that will eventually return it to potential GDP.
π48.1%
π€38.9%
π12.9%
There is a natural rate of unemployment to which the economy tends in the long run.
π26.0%
π€38.8%
π35.2%
The Federal Reserve has the capacity to achieve a constant rate of growth in the money supply if it so desired.
π25.3%
π€39.9%
π34.8%
Changes in aggregate demand affect real GDP in the short run but not in the long run.
π34.9%
π€31.7%
π33.4%
The level of government spending relative to GDP in the U.S. should be reduced (disregarding expenditures for stabilization).
π57.3%
π€19.7%
π23.0%
Macro models based on the assumption of a βrepresentative, rational agentβ yield generally useful and reasonably accurate predictions.
π43.2%
π€42.5%
π14.3%
In the short run, a reduction in unemployment causes the rate of inflation to increase.
π50.0%
π€37.6%
π12.4%
If the federal budget is to be balanced, it should be done over the course of the business cycle rather than yearly.
π7.0%
π€24.7%
π68.3%
A large federal budget deficit has an adverse impact on the economy.
π38.6%
π€41.7%
π19.7%
Fiscal policy (e.g. tax cut and/or expenditure increase) has a significant stimulative impact on a less than fully employed economy.
π5.9%
π€31.5%
π62.6%
Appropriately designed fiscal policy can increase the long-run rate of capital formation and economic growth.
π9.6%
π€27.0%
π63.4%
Management of the business cycle should be left to the Federal Reserve; activist fiscal policies should be avoided.
π66.6%
π€21.2%
π12.2%
Inflation is caused primarily by too much growth in the money supply.
π29.2%
π€36.9%
π33.9%
The distribution of income in the U.S. should be more equal.
π14.2%
π€20.6%
π65.2%
The Federal Reserve should focus on a low rate of inflation rather than other goals such as employment, economic growth, or asset bubbles.
π61.6%
π€20.5%
π18.0%
The Earned Income Tax Credit program should be expanded.
π9.9%
π€30.0%
π60.1%
During the pandemic, there is a trade-off between economic well-being and public health measures.
π43.7%
π€22.4%
π33.9%
The distribution of income and wealth has little, if any, impact on economic stability and growth.
π77.7%
π€16.2%
π6.1%
Immigration generally has a net positive economic effect for the US economy.
π3.0%
π€19.4%
π77.6%
Redistribution of income is a legitimate role for the US Government.
π13.7%
π€22.3%
π64.0%
Climate change poses a major risk to the US economy.
π14.0%
π€14.3%
π71.7%
A minimum wage increases unemployment among young and unskilled workers.
π35.0%
π€35.1%
π29.8%
Welfare reforms which place time limits on public assistance have increased the general well-being of society.
π45.9%
π€32.7%
π21.4%
The competitive model is generally more useful for understanding the U.S. economy than are game theoretic models of imperfect competition or collusion.
π53.5%
π€30.1%
π16.4%
Pollution taxes or marketable pollution permits are a more efficient approach to pollution control than emission standards.
π12.2%
π€27.8%
π60.0%
Easing restrictions on immigration will depress the average wage rate in the United States.
π63.8%
π€24.3%
π11.9%
The long run benefits of higher taxes on fossil fuels outweigh the short run economic costs.
π11.9%
π€15.0%
π73.1%
Antitrust laws should be enforced vigorously.
π7.0%
π€25.2%
π67.8%
Reducing the tax rate on income from capital gains would encourage investment and promote economic growth.
π53.5%
π€25.9%
π20.6%
There are few gender compensation and promotion differentials unexplained by differences in career and/or life choices.
π58.6%
π€20.6%
π20.8%
Reducing the regulatory power of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would improve the efficiency of the U.S. economy.
π74.0%
π€15.3%
π10.6%
Lower marginal income tax rates increase the time spent at work and reduce time at leisure.
π48.7%
π€33.8%
π17.5%
The structural U.S. federal deficit should be eliminated through a combination of lower expenditures and higher tax revenues.
π36.5%
π€39.4%
π24.2%
The increasing inequality in the distribution of income in the U.S. is due primarily to the benefits and pressures of a global economy.
π64.1%
π€25.4%
π10.5%
Addressing biases in individuals and institutions can improve both equity and efficiency.
π10.0%
π€25.3%
π64.8%
Differences in economic outcomes between whites and blacks in the US are in large part due to the persistence of discriminatory norms and institutions.
π22.1%
π€23.8%
π54.1%
Corporate economic power has become too concentrated.
π14.8%
π€22.6%
π62.6%
Lab experiments and randomized controlled trials are one of the most effective tools to identify causal effects and evaluate policies.
π22.4%
π€45.3%
π32.2%
Universal health insurance coverage will increase economic welfare in the United States.
π12.2%
π€19.2%
π68.6%
The US economy provides sufficient opportunities for social mobility.
π52.3%
π€30.0%
π17.7%